Technical guide — for electricians
Unidirectional and bidirectional RCBOs
Since Amendment 3:2024, and consolidated in Amendment 4:2026, BS 7671:2018+A4:2026 (previous A2:2022+A3:2024 version also current until 15 October 2026) asks a question most boards were never designed around: where is the supply allowed to connect to this device? A solar inverter, a battery or a bidirectional charger energises the consumer unit from the other side, and a device that was only ever rated for one set of supply terminals cannot be assumed to work correctly that way round — the failure can be silent, with the MCB part still working normally. This page explains what the terms mean, why the requirement exists, where it applies and how to check what is actually fitted.
The basics
What the two words actually mean
Unidirectional device
Intended by its manufacturer for a source of supply to be connected to one defined set of terminals. Those terminals are marked — "line/load", "in/out" or a power-flow arrow. Virtually every RCBO and MCB fitted in UK domestic boards historically is in this category unless the manufacturer states otherwise.
Bidirectional device
Intended by its manufacturer for a source of supply to be connected to either or both sets of terminals. It can be relied on whatever direction the energy flows — which is what source circuits need where an inverter or battery energises the installation from the load side.
Direction and waveform are two different questions
It is easy to merge these, and they are easy to confuse. Direction is where the supply may be connected — unidirectional vs bidirectional. Waveform is what shape the leaking current is — Type AC, A, F or B. A solar or battery installation usually needs both answered correctly: a device that is bidirectional but blind to smooth DC leakage is no more use than a Type B device that cannot operate with the supply connected the other way round. See RCD, RCBO and AFDD types for the waveform half.
How it works
Inside an RCD — and why direction can matter
Every RCD and RCBO measures the same thing: the difference between the current going out on the line conductor and coming back on the neutral. Both conductors pass through a toroidal — doughnut-shaped — magnetic core. When the currents balance, their magnetic effects cancel and nothing happens. When they differ by more than the rated residual current (usually 30 mA), the imbalance induces a signal in a sensing winding around the core, and that signal trips the device.
There are two ways that sensing signal is turned into a trip, and both constructions exist in both directional classes:
- Electromechanical devices use the sensing signal directly to trip a high-precision relay, with no electronic amplification. Typical RCCBs are electromechanical — though electronic ones exist.
- Electronic devices amplify the sensing signal with a small electronic circuit before tripping. Many compact RCBOs use electronics — and compact bidirectional RCBOs are on the market too, so "electronic" does not mean "unidirectional".
What goes wrong with a unidirectional device is specific and, in the worst case, sneaky. Some electronic RCD circuits can be damaged when voltage remains on their outgoing terminals after the device has operated — the IET identifies operation following an earth fault, or simply pressing the test button, as relevant circumstances. Backfeed a unidirectional device from an inverter or battery and it can be left with its residual-current function permanently inoperable while still looking and switching perfectly normally. For directionally marked MCBs, reverse connection can separately impair the arc-extinguishing and short-circuit performance. This is the whole argument for Regulation 530.3.201: selection must take the appropriate use of unidirectional and bidirectional devices into account.
The regulations
Why BS 7671 now requires it
The 18th Edition was written around supplies connected at one set of terminals. As inverters, batteries and vehicle-to-grid chargers became ordinary, devices started being energised from both sides — ratings that never covered it. The amendments answer that directly:
Regulation 530.3.201 — added by Amendment 3:2024, consolidated in Amendment 4
Protective devices must be selected and erected taking account of the appropriate use of unidirectional and bidirectional devices. The same amendment added the definitions of the two terms. Amendment 3 was issued free of charge for immediate implementation on 31 July 2024, and its requirements are incorporated into the consolidated Amendment 4:2026 edition.
Regulation 551.7.1 — Section 551, low-voltage generating sets
Redrafted in Amendment 4. It includes an indent requiring a suitable protective device where generation runs in parallel with another source, and restricts connecting a source to the load side of an RCD under certain conditions. Where an RCD provides additional protection for the generator-connection circuit, it must disconnect all live conductors including the neutral — a solid-neutral RCBO does not meet that particular requirement.
Chapter 57 — stationary battery systems (new in Amendment 4)
The first dedicated battery chapter in BS 7671. Stationary batteries are treated as a generating set, not a load, so the devices in a battery circuit must be selected for the power flow that charging and discharging create — and the IET's announcement of Amendment 4 specifically flags protective-device suitability for two-way energy flow in battery systems.
Sections 712 and 722 — solar PV and EV charging
PV and EV circuits carry their own device rules. Under 712.531.3.5.1, the RCD protecting the PV AC supply circuit is Type B unless the inverter provides at least simple separation between AC and DC or the manufacturer states Type B is unnecessary. Under 722.531.3.101, each charging point needs RCD protection at 30 mA or better, Type A, F or B. And where a vehicle can export energy back through the charge point (V2G / V2H), the supply-direction question applies as well.
Where it applies
Where the direction question bites
Solar PV and battery storage
Bidirectional neededAn inverter pushes energy back into the installation whenever it is generating or discharging. Where an RCD protects a generator operating in parallel with the network, the IET's guidance is that it must be bidirectional — and Amendment 4's battery chapter treats stationary batteries as a generating set, not a load, so the same logic applies to the battery's energy path.
EV chargers with V2G / V2H
Depends on the chargerA one-way charger draws current like any other load, so the direction question is ordinary — but the waveform question is not, which is why Section 722 requires Type A, F or B RCD protection with 30 mA or better at each charging point. A bidirectional charger that exports from the vehicle reverses the energy flow through the installation's devices, so the direction rules apply too.
Generators and changeover arrangements
Bidirectional neededA generating set running in parallel with the supply, or any standby arrangement that can feed the installation, puts energy through the protective devices from the other direction. Section 551 covers the arrangements — and its requirement that an additional-protection RCD on the generator connection disconnect all live conductors including the neutral catches the solid-neutral RCBOs common in modern boards.
Ordinary final circuits
Standard device fineSockets, lighting, cooker and shower circuits in a normal installation only ever see the supply connected at one set of terminals. A correctly selected standard device is fine here. Having solar PV elsewhere in the house does not make the kitchen socket circuit bidirectional; the requirement applies to the devices in the source's energy path, not to every RCBO in the board.
Related reading: Solar PV & battery regulations · EV charger regulations
What goes wrong
Using a unidirectional device the wrong way round
The RCD function can be knocked out — permanently, and silently
BEAMA's technical bulletin warns that incorrectly connected unidirectional RCDs can have their residual-current function permanently rendered inoperable, yet remain in service with no indication that anything is wrong. The IET adds that an RCBO's thermal and magnetic overcurrent protection can keep working even after the residual-current electronics have failed — so the board still trips on overloads and short circuits, and nothing appears broken, but the 30 mA additional protection is gone.
Short-circuit breaking can be impaired
For directionally marked MCBs, BEAMA warns that reverse connection can impair the arc-extinguishing and short-circuit performance of the device. The same logic is why a device's breaking rating must be respected in the direction the manufacturer specifies — interrupting a high fault current backwards through a device rated for one direction cannot be assumed to work.
A clean RCD test result doesn't prove it
Installation RCD testing is functional verification of the device in its installed orientation. It does not certify the device for bidirectional use — that comes from the product's design and the manufacturer's declaration. Do not deliberately reverse-feed an unidentified device to 'see whether it still trips': that is exactly the exposure the warnings describe, and it can leave the device permanently damaged.
How it lands on the EICR
Electrical Safety First and the Wiring Regulations Advisory Group guidance sets out the route: contact the manufacturer for the device concerned, and if a declaration establishes bidirectional suitability, keep it with the EICR — no classification is needed on that issue. Without that confirmation, the guidance distinguishes C3 where the device is relied on only for additional protection from C2 where it is relied on for fault-protection disconnection times. The code follows the actual reliance and evidence, not a blanket rule.
The market
Devices manufacturers confirm as bidirectional
Manufacturers have been adding bidirectional RCBOs to their ranges since Amendment 3. These are examples the manufacturers themselves confirm — they are a starting point for identifying what is in the board, not a substitute for checking the datasheet of the exact model fitted:
Eaton
xEffect FRBm6/M RCBO range explicitly described as bidirectional, with line-voltage-independent tripping.
Hager
Guidance identifies ADC920R and the two-module ADA920U as bidirectional and neutral-switching; current ADB932R / ADC932R product pages also state bidirectional. Hager warns against incorrectly installed unidirectional or solid-neutral RCBOs.
Wylex / Electrium
Manufacturer statement confirms NHXS1 miniature RCBOs, NXS miniature AFDD/RCBOs and WRCBX RCBOs as bidirectional, 30 mA, switching line and neutral.
BG Electrical
Clearly classified both ways: the CUCRB…DPA / CUCRC…DPA double-pole Type A ranges are bidirectional, and the range page separately lists unidirectional single-pole B-curve and C-curve devices.
MK Sentry
The miniature switched-neutral RCBO technical sheet states bidirectional, Type A, 6–40 A. That does not establish the same capability for older solid-neutral Sentry devices.
Scolmore / Elucian
September 2024 launch added Type A bidirectional RCBOs, B and C curves, 6–45 A, to the Elucian range. Earlier Elucian RCBOs are not covered by that announcement.
FuseBox
Manufacturer announces bidirectional mini RCBOs with switched live and neutral; the brochure identifies RTAMB…BD / RTAMC…BD Type A products.
Schneider Electric
No sufficiently specific manufacturer confirmation of UK RCBO directional capability was found in the sources checked — check the datasheet for the exact model rather than assuming either way.
Two cautions from BEAMA's bulletin: a "BD" suffix or similar code is a manufacturer-specific convention, not an industry standard; and a bidirectional current product does not establish that earlier versions of the same or a similar product were bidirectional.
Getting it right
How to check, specify and install correctly
Check the exact device — catalogue number, not brand or look
BEAMA is explicit: suitability must be confirmed from the catalogue number, version, markings, connection diagram and the manufacturer's instructions or declaration — not from the brand, the module width, the pole count or a Type A marking. A device from a brand that makes bidirectional RCBOs elsewhere in its range is not automatically bidirectional itself, and a bidirectional current product does not establish that earlier versions of the same product were.
Look for the direction markings — they can be subtle
Where supply and load must be distinguished, the product standards require clear marking — examples include 'in/out', 'line/load' and power-flow arrows, and BEAMA notes the marking may be on the side of the device rather than the face. Line and neutral symbols on their own identify the conductors, not the supply direction. Where a device is marked, connect it exactly as marked; if it is unmarked, the datasheet decides, not a guess.
Never connect a source to the load side of an RCD
Amendment 4's redrafted 551.7.1 restricts connecting a source to the load side of an RCD under certain conditions. A battery or PV inverter should connect through its own suitably rated device arrangement — and where an RCD provides additional protection on a generator connection, remember it must disconnect all live conductors including the neutral, which rules out solid-neutral RCBOs for that duty.
Separate the direction question from the waveform question
A bidirectional device is not automatically a Type B device, and a Type B device is not automatically bidirectional. Direction (where the supply may be connected) and waveform (what shape the residual current is — Type AC, A, F or B) are two independent selection decisions, and a PV or battery installation usually needs both answered correctly.
Record it at design, on the certificate and at inspection
At design and installation, record the device selection for the source circuits and the manufacturer declaration that supports it. At periodic inspection, follow the Electrical Safety First / WRAG route: obtain the manufacturer's confirmation for the device actually fitted, keep it with the EICR if it confirms bidirectional suitability, and code only where no confirmation exists — C3 for additional-protection reliance, C2 where fault-protection disconnection relies on it.
Testing & safe isolation
What changes on site
RCD testing: a pass is not a bidirectional rating
Installation RCD testing functionally verifies the device in its installed orientation. It does not certify the device for bidirectional use — that comes from the product's design and the manufacturer's declaration. And do not reverse-feed an unidentified device to "see whether it still trips": that is the exact exposure that can permanently damage the residual-current function.
More than one source of energy
An installation with PV, battery storage or V2G has several things that can energise the conductors. Follow the full safe isolation procedure and prove dead with respect to every source — AC supply and the DC side of the array or batteries — before touching conductors. A bidirectional device rating does not itself make a system safe to work on; isolating the grid supply alone does not isolate the inverter's DC input or a battery.
Retrofit sources on older boards
A battery or EV charger added to a consumer unit from a few years back may sit behind devices that were never rated for a supply on the load side. At periodic inspection, check how the source actually connects and confirm the fitted devices against the manufacturer's declaration — not just what the paperwork from the original installation says.
Clearing up confusion
Common mistakes
✗ The RCD tester passed it, so it's fine.
Instead: The tester functionally verifies the device in its installed orientation. It does not certify the device for bidirectional use — that comes from the manufacturer's declaration for the exact catalogue number fitted.
✗ It's Type A, so it covers the PV.
Instead: Type describes the residual waveform the device can detect — AC, pulsating DC, smooth DC. It says nothing about where the supply may be connected. A PV circuit can need a device that answers both questions correctly.
✗ Every RCBO in a house with solar must be bidirectional.
Instead: No. The requirement bites on the devices in the energy path of the source — the way the inverter or battery connects through. Ordinary load circuits still see the supply at one set of terminals.
✗ It's electronic, so it must be unidirectional — or electromechanical, so it's always fine.
Instead: Neither generalisation is safe. The IET points out that typical RCCBs are electromechanical but electronic ones exist, many compact RCBOs use electronics, and compact bidirectional RCBOs are on the market. Construction and directional rating are separate characteristics; the datasheet decides.
Reference documents
- BS 7671:2018+A4:2026 (previous A2:2022+A3:2024 version also current until 15 October 2026) ↗
Regulation 530.3.201 and the unidirectional/bidirectional definitions (Amendment 3:2024, consolidated in Amendment 4:2026); Regulation 551.7.1; Chapter 57 (batteries); 712.531.3.5.1; 722.531.3.101
- IET Wiring Matters — Bidirectional protective devices (March 2024) ↗
The IET's explanation of the A3 definitions, electronic vs electromechanical construction, and when a bidirectional device is required
- BEAMA — Technical bulletin: connection of unidirectional and bidirectional protective devices ↗
Marking requirements, the permanent silent loss of RCD function in incorrectly connected devices, and reverse-connection effects on MCB short-circuit performance
- Electrical Safety First / WRAG — bidirectional devices in existing installations ↗
The manufacturer-declaration route for EICRs, and the C3 / C2 distinction where no confirmation exists
- SELECT — Amendment 4: what's new ↗
Final overview confirming 530.3.201's consolidation, the 531.3.3 series-RCD note, the 551.7.1 redraft and the new Chapter 57
- IET Wiring Matters — RCDs for EV supply equipment (May 2024) ↗
722.531.3.101 RCD requirements for charging points and the Type A / F / B and RDC-DD arrangements
Manufacturer datasheets and instructions
The only reliable statement of directional capability for a specific model — the manufacturer list above is a starting point, not a substitute for the datasheet of the device in front of you
Cited by regulation, chapter and edition only — no printed page numbers, as pagination varies between formats of the same publication.